Patent No. 5666105 Personal radiation hazard meter
Patent No. 5666105
Personal radiation hazard meter (Adler, et al., Sep 9, 1997)
Abstract
An electromagnetic radiation monitor for use in close proximity with the human body comprised of an electromagnetic radiation sensor for detecting hazardous radiation levels. The radiation monitor also includes means for shielding the sensor from electromagnetic interference caused by the human body. A single layer of a plurality of lossy materials arranged in a precise, predetermined mosaic pattern is used in conjunction with a shield to prevent interference due to unwanted reflections caused by the shield resulting in a wideband frequency response previously unachievable.
Notes:
Personal 
  radiation hazard meter. Filed March 1996, granted September 1997. Detects electromagnetic 
  radiation intensity levels. Does detect .01 milliwatts per centimeter squared 
  level. May be useful as part of detection system. 
  
 BACKGROUND 
  OF THE INVENTION 
  
  1. Field of the Invention 
  
  This invention relates to electromagnetic radiation detection devices. More 
  particularly, this invention relates to electromagnetic radiation detection 
  devices which may be worn by an individual to alert such an individual of harmful 
  levels of electromagnetic energy over a broadband of frequencies. 
  
  2. Description of Prior Art 
  
  The use of high power radio and microwave frequencies in the military, commercial 
  and consumer applications has grown substantially. The applications of high 
  power electromagnetic sources are numerous, including for example, radar, satellite 
  communication ground terminals, radio transmitting antennas and microwave ovens. 
  
  
  One problem with high power electromagnetic radiation is its potential harmful 
  effects on lining tissue. The American National Standards Institute have established 
  safety guidelines to prevent exposure to harmful levels of electromagnetic radiation. 
  
  
  Harmful levels of electromagnetic radiation may not be detected by an individual 
  until permanent damage results. Accordingly, a work place in the vicinity of 
  high power electromagnetic sources can be a dangerous environment. Therefore, 
  there is a need for a device which can sense and measure electromagnetic radiation 
  and provide an alert signal indicating harmful ambient levels. Furthermore, 
  because of the numerous applications of electromagnetic sources and the multitude 
  of frequencies generated, such electromagnetic radiation detection devices having 
  a broadband frequency performance are desirable. 
  
  Broadband electromagnetic radiation detection devices have been used in the 
  art for many years. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,931,573 assigned to the assignee 
  of the present invention, discloses a hand-held radiation detector. However, 
  hand-held radiation detectors may sometimes be cumbersome and inconvenient. 
  Therefore, radiation hazard meters which can be worn by an individual are both 
  practical and desirable. 
  
  When constructing a personal radiation hazard meter, electromagnetic interference 
  from a human body is a concern. It is known that interference in the form of 
  electromagnetic scattering results when electromagnetic radiation reflects off 
  the human body. Such scattered reflections interfere with the electromagnetic 
  radiation being detected by the radiation detector and introduce inaccuracies. 
  
  
  To minimize body interference, the radiation sensors of personal radiation hazard 
  meters require shielding of the electromagnetic radiation sensor from the user's 
  body. The shield, however, may produce its own source of interference due to 
  unwanted reflections. 
  
  The use of lossy material as a radiation absorber to absorb reflective radiation 
  is well known in the art. However, lossy material has an acceptable reflective 
  characteristic over a limited frequency range. Generally, the more highly absorbent 
  the lossy material is the smaller the useful frequency range it has. The relatively 
  large operational bandwidth of the monitor precludes the use of a single type 
  of lossy material. This property of lossy material suggests that the use of 
  multiple layers of lossy material having different absorption (and, accordingly, 
  reflective) characteristics would be most effective in eliminating reflective 
  interference from the conductive shield. 
  
  An example of this technique is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,168,265 (Aslan). A 
  less absorbent/reflective lossy material is disposed behind the radiation sensor, 
  then at least a second layer of more absorbent/reflective lossy material is 
  disposed behind the first layer and in front of the shield. The lamination of 
  lossy materials reduced body reflected radiation and lessened measurement errors 
  over the operational bandwidth of the monitor. 
  
  Although layering lossy materials has been tried what is desired is a body worn 
  microwave radiation monitor having a frequency response that is immune to body 
  reflected interference. 
  
  SUMMARY AND OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION 
  
  
  A personal radiation monitor is provided having the back of its radiation sensors 
  shielded to enable the meter to be worn on the human body without reflected 
  body interference. A single layer of different lossy materials arranged in a 
  mosaic is disposed between the shield and the sensor which effectively eliminates 
  reflective interference from the shield. 
  
  The object of this invention is to provide an improved personal radiation hazard 
  meter which has accurate broadband frequency performance characteristics. 
  
  It is another objective of this invention to provide an improved personal radiation 
  hazard meter which minimizes the effects of electromagnetic radiation interference 
  caused by a human body. 
  
  It is yet another object of this invention to provide an improved personal radiation 
  hazard meter which displays the power density of the electromagnetic radiation 
  being sensed and alarms the user whenever the radiation exceeds a user programmed 
  level. 
  
  It is another object of this invention to provide an improved personal radiation 
  hazard meter which may be used with an earphone to allow the user to work in 
  high noise environments. 
  
  Other objects and advantages of the personal radiation monitor will become apparent 
  to those skilled in the art after reading the detailed description of the preferred 
  embodiment. 
 DESCRIPTION 
  OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
  
  The preferred embodiment will be described with reference to the drawing figures 
  where like numerals represent like elements throughout. 
  
  With reference to FIGS. 1-5, there is shown a radiation hazard meter 10 which 
  is to be used in close proximity to a human body. The meter 10 has a two-piece 
  housing 12 comprised of a front cover 14 and a containment 16. The back of the 
  monitor includes a clip 26, so that the monitor can be clipped to a user's belt 
  or clothing. The interior of the housing 12 is partitioned into lower and upper 
  chambers 28, 30 by an interior wall 32. The lower chamber 28 houses an antenna 
  assembly 34 which functions as the radiation sensor. The upper chamber 30 houses 
  the electronic processing circuitry 36 which is electrically coupled to sensor 
  34. The electronic processing circuitry 36 analyzes the radiation levels detected 
  by the antenna assembly 34. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 3,931,573, and the 
  references cited therein which patents are incorporated herein by reference 
  as if fully set forth. 
  
  The electronic processing circuitry 36 is operatively associated with a light 
  emitting diode (LED) 38, an alphanumeric liquid-crystal display (LCD) 40, and 
  a speaker 42 associated with an earphone receptacle 44. The LED 38 continuously 
  flashes to alarm the user when the radiation sensor 34 detects electromagnetic 
  radiation which exceeds a user programmable pre-determined level. The radiation 
  hazard meter 10 also warns the user with speaker 42 producing an audible alert 
  signal either alone or through the earphone receptacle 44 to the user via an 
  earphone 45. In addition, the alphanumeric LCD display 40 also flashes when 
  the radiation hazard meter 10 alarms. 
  
  In the preferred embodiment, the electronic processing circuitry 36 is configured 
  to permit audioranging and multiple modes of measurement indication. The radiation 
  hazard meter 10 autoranges from 0.02 to 20.0 mW/cm.sup.2 and has a user programmable 
  alarm level setting between the ranges of 0.01 to 20.0 mW/cm.sup.2. A measurement 
  indication switch 46 enables the user to change the instantaneous power density 
  indicated on the LCD display 40 from milliwatts per centimeter squared or the 
  six minute average power density in milliwatts per centimeters squared, depending 
  on the switch setting. 
  
  The electronic processing circuitry 36 is powered by one or more lithium batteries 
  48 which are installed into the upper compartment via a battery hatch 50. An 
  on/off switch 52 controls the power supplied from the batteries 48 to the electronics 
  36. 
  
  To prevent undue interference with the performance of the electronic processing 
  circuitry 36, shielding is provided. In particular, a combination of layered 
  absorbent material and metallic shield are disposed in front of and below the 
  electronic processing circuitry 36. The circuitry shielding is comprised of 
  a first layer of a relatively low absorbent lossy material 54, a layer of relatively 
  high absorbent lossy material 56 and a thin layer of foil or conductive paint 
  58 behind the relatively high absorbent lossy material 56. The relatively low 
  absorbent layer of lossy material 54 is Eccosorb.RTM. LS-16, manufactured by 
  Emerson and Cuming, Inc. The relatively high absorbent layer of lossy material 
  56 is Eccosorb.RTM. FGM-40, also manufactured by Emerson and Cuming. The properties 
  of the lossy materials are set forth in Emerson and Cuming's Technical Bulletins 
  8-2-23 dated January, 1985 and 2-11 dated November, 1980 which are herein incorporated 
  by reference as if fully set forth. 
  
  Additional shielding in the form of conductive paint or foil 58 is provided 
  for the sides, partially shown for clarity in FIG. 4, of the electronic processing 
  circuitry 36. Further protection is provided below the electronic processing 
  circuitry 36 by absorber 59 mounted on the upper wall of the lower chamber 28. 
  Absorber 59 is a uniform layer of lossy material such as Eccosorb.RTM. FGM-40 
  or LS-26 manufactured by Emerson and Cuming. The interior of the upper portion 
  of the containment 16 is provided with a coating of metallic paint 61 which 
  provides shielding in back of the processing circuitry 33. 
  
  The radiation sensor assembly 34 comprises a dielectric panel 60. Mounted on 
  the front of the dielectric panel 60 are two mutually orthogonal sensor assemblies 
  62 which are coplanar with each other. As shown in FIG. 6, each sensor assembly 
  62 includes an array of thin film thermocouples 66, 68 formed on a substrate 
  69. Each thermocouple is composed of two dissimilar metals such as bismuth 66 
  and antimony 68 and are connected in series as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 3,931,573. 
  
  
  Each thermocouple supporting substrate 69 is sandwiched between a pair of dielectric 
  covers 70 which are mounted on the panel 60. The dielectric covers 70 are made 
  of boron nitride chosen for the properties of high thermal stability and high 
  electrical resistance. The sensor assembly 34 absorbs and converts a portion 
  of the impinging radiation into heat. The heat is then converted thermoelectrically 
  into a dc voltage for processing, measurement and display. 
  
  A radiation window 72 is defined in the front of the sensor chamber 28 in the 
  housing. The window 72 is defined by a square array of pyramidal shapes 74 molded 
  on both sides of the housing cover 14. At high frequencies, this construction 
  tends to have a scattering effect on any reflected signal to inhibit reflections 
  back onto the antenna, covering a wide range of incident angles. 
  
  Since the radiation monitor is designed to be worn on a person's body, shielding 
  is desirable behind the radiation sensor assembly 34 to prevent interference 
  attributable to the user's body. Such shielding is provided in the form of a 
  layer of conductive paint and/or foil 76 disposed on the back wall of the sensor 
  chamber 28. No shielding is provided on the bottom or sides of the sensor chamber 
  28 since the effect of body interference from those angles is negligible. 
  
  Although the metallic shielding 76 serves to shield the sensor assembly from 
  reflected interference from the rear, it similarly causes radiation measured 
  from the front to be reflected back towards the sensor assembly 34. Such reflected 
  radiation affects the frequency response of the sensor resulting in measurement 
  inaccuracies across the operational bandwidth. 
  
  As shown in FIG. 7, in the preferred embodiment, a single layer mosaic of two 
  uniform lossy materials, Eccosorb.RTM. FGM-40 78 and Eccosorb.RTM. MF-190 79 
  both 3.2 mm thick, are mounted directly on the metallic shielding 76. The thermocouple 
  sensors 66 and 68 are disposed approximately 5.7 mm in front of the front surface 
  of the layer of lossy material 78 of which approximately 3.2 mm is an air gap 
  between the mounting panel 60 and the lossy material 78. 
  
  Two variations of the preferred embodiment vary the height of the lossy material 
  79 directly under each radiation sensor 62 as shown in FIGS. 7B and 7C. FIG. 
  7B shows the thickness of the low absorbent lossy material 79 less than the 
  thickness of the high absorbent lossy material 78. FIG. 7C shows the thickness 
  of the low absorbent lossy material 79 greater than the high absorbent lossy 
  material 78. Varying the thickness of the low absorbent lossy material acts 
  to tune and flatten the frequency response of the radiation sensor 62 assembly. 
  
  
  An alternative embodiment of the uniform lossy material mosaic is shown in FIG. 
  8. The low absorbent lossy material 79 is circular rather than a silhouette 
  of each radiation sensor 62 assembly. As shown in FIG. 8A, both types of lossy 
  material are the same thickness as previously discussed. As shown in FIGS. 8B 
  and 8C, the low absorbent lossy material is varied in thickness to similarly 
  tune the frequency response of the radiation sensors 62. 
  
  FIG. 9 illustrates the frequency response of the initial attempt utilizing a 
  single layer of lossy material in the radiation hazard monitor 10. As seen from 
  the graph, minimum and maximum responses varied about 6.5 dB across a frequency 
  band of 1 GHz to 18 Ghz. 
  
  In comparison, FIG. 10 shows the frequency response of the preferred embodiment. 
  As seen from the graph, the radiation hazard meter 10 exhibits a relatively 
  flat frequency response with less than 4.0 dB variation across a bandwidth of 
  1 GHz to 18 GHz. This is an improvement of 3.0 dB as compared to a single uniform 
  layer comprised of only one lossy material. 
  
  In operation, the radiation sensor 34 absorbs a portion of the electromagnetic 
  radiation which enters the sensing chamber 28 and generates a dc voltage that 
  is proportional to the energy of the electromagnetic radiation. The electromagnetic 
  radiation that travels past the radiation sensor 34 propagates through and is 
  partially absorbed by the lossy material 78 and converted to heat. Any radiation 
  which is not absorbed by the lossy material 78 reflects off the shield 76. The 
  reflected electromagnetic radiation travels in the reverse direction through 
  the lossy material 78 towards the radiation sensor 34. The round-trip propagation 
  through the lossy material 78 substantially reduces or eliminates the energy 
  of the reflected electromagnetic radiation. Although some of the radiation reflects 
  directly off the front of the lossy material 78, the result is the virtual elimination 
  of electromagnetic radiation scattering. 
  
  Although the invention has been described 
  in part by making detailed reference to certain specific embodiments, such details 
  are intended to be instructive rather than restrictive. It will be appreciated 
  by those skilled in the art that many variations may be made in the structure 
  and mode of operation without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention 
  as disclosed in the teachings herein. 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Comments