Patent No. 5307807 Method and system for three dimensional tomography of activity and connectivity of brain and heart electromagnetic waves generators
Patent No. 5307807
Method and system for three dimensional tomography of activity and connectivity of brain and heart electromagnetic waves generators (Valdes Sosa, et al., May 3, 1994)
Abstract
A method and system for the localization and characterization of the generators of human brain electromagnetic physiological activity includes a set of bioelectromagnetic amplifiers, sensorial stimulators, and a computer based system for signal analog to digital conversion and recording. Sufficient statistics, including higher order statistical moments, for event related components are computed from the recorded signals, either in the time, frequency, or time-frequency domain, retaining stationary, non-stationary, linear, and non-linear information. The localizations, orientations, activities, and connectivities of the generators are obtained by solving the inverse problem using sufficient statistics under anatomical and functional constraints. Realistic head geometry and conductivity profiles are used to transform the measurements into infinite homogeneous medium measurements, through use of ananatomical deconvolution operator, thus simplifying optimally inverse solution computations. Goodness of fit tests for the inverse solution are provided. Generator characteristics are visually displayed in the form of three and two dimensional head images, and optionally include probability scaled images obtained by comparing estimated generator characteristics with those of a normal population sampled and stored in a normative data base.
Notes:
BACKGROUND
OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to electronic computerized medical instruments
and more particularly to the localization and characterization of the generators
of brain and heart electric and magnetic activity by a non-invasive computerized
method and system.
2. Description of Related Art
The determination of the three dimensional localization and of the temporal
activity of the neuronal generators which give place to waveshapes, in an electroencephalogram
(EEG) and an magnetoencephalogram (MEG) related to pathologies of the central
nervous system (CNS), constitutes an important medical problem. Such knowledge
can be helpful in producing more precise diagnostics in diverse neuropsychiatric
pathologies and in determining more efficient treatments. A typical example
is the study of the focus location followed by its sequential propagation in
epilepsies that are being evaluated for surgical treatment.
The EEG and the MEG both have their common origin in the ionic currents produced
by the cellular elements (the neurons) composing the CNS. The total current
density vector field is determined by the vectorial additive combination of
all of the elementary currents. The simultaneous activation of a large number
of such elements, together with an adequate geometrical distribution, produces
resulting electric potentials and magnetic fields which can be measured outside
the head. In the transformation process from total current density to measurable
external fields, the effects of the volume conductor properties of the different
tissues composing the head must be taken into account: brain, meninges, cerebral
spinal fluid, skull, and scalp.
The resulting measured fields have the characteristics of a stochastic process,
which can be described either in the frequency domain or in the temporal domain,
as a function of the statistical moments. In the case of a Gaussian process,
first and second order moments give an exhaustive description.
The neural elements which generate a given EEG or MEG component may be localized
on a small cortical area ("concentrated generator") or may, on the other hand,
be widely distributed in different parts of the CNS ("diffuse generator"). The
determination of the spatial distribution of the generators and of the multivariate
statistical moments describing their interactions is very important.
For a number of decades electric potential measurements of the CNS have been
performed by means of electrodes placed on the scalp. Much experience has accumulated
on the practical utility of the visual inspection of the EEG in the diagnostics
and treatment of patients with neuropsychiatric diseases. More recently, brain
magnetic fields have been measured (U.S. Pat. No. 4,591,787), offering complementary
information to that obtained from the EEG.
The current state of the art, as reflected in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,201,224; 4,408,616;
and 4,417,592 is summarized as follows. Quantitative analysis of brain electric
activity by means of digital signal processing methods (QEEG) allows an objective
evaluation of the functioning of the CNS. The signal recorded at each electrode
is summarized by means of a set of descriptive parameters (DPs), based on stochastic
process modeling. The DPs reflect the normal and pathological functioning of
the CNS. Topographic maps based on the DPs are clinically useful, and even more
so when statistically compared to a normative data base.
However, this analysis method generates an excessively large number of DPs,
thus making quite difficult the evaluation of a particular patient. Moreover,
the method does not attempt to localize the generators responsible for the measured
DPs, thus limiting the clinical usefulness and contributing to the excessive
redundancy of the DPs due to volume conduction effects. Finally, EEG is limited
to the study of second order moments in the frequency domain, which means that
the EEG has been implicitly assumed to be a Gaussian stochastic process, despite
evidence revealing the non-linear nature of such signals.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,913,160 a method for the reduction of the dimensionality
of the DPs is proposed based on principal components (PCs) computation. This
procedure produces minimum sets of linear combinations of the original DPs,
with optimum descriptive properties, but which are meaningless in terms of the
underlying neuronal generators and their localization. Furthermore, this method
does not take into account the non-linear nature of the original signals.
An improvement in the usefulness of QEEG has been achieved by means of biophysical
models which take into account the behavior of the electromagnetic fields produced
by current sources in a complex volume conductor such as the human head. In
this sense, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,416,288; 4,753,246; and 4,736,751 propose procedures
for eliminating the distortion effects due to the volume conductor. However,
they do not deal with the spatial characterization of the generators.
Several attempts have been made to fit equivalent dipoles to measured fields
in order to represent, albeit approximately, concentrated generators, either
in the time domain or in the frequency domain. These procedures are based on
the minimization of a certain distance criterion between the measurements and
the theoretical field values due to a current dipole inside a volume conductor
model of the head.
This type of procedure for source localization, based on first order moment
data, does not take into account the existence of diffuse generators, nor the
existence of other sources of "spatial noise". Furthermore, a statistical method
for testing the goodness of fit of the source model is not provided. On the
other hand, there is a fundamental limit on the number of dipoles that can be
estimated, the maximum number being roughly equal to the number of electric
or magnetic signals divided by six.
In French patent 2,622,990, several improvements are achieved by using frequency
domain second order moment data, in the form of coherence matrices. An estimation
method for the cross spectral spatial noise matrix is proposed, under the assumption
of interelectrode independence, the method thus being statistically equivalent
to the classical factor analysis model. The eigenvectors of the common factor
space are then used for determining the concentrated generators (as many as
the number of common factors).
However, empirical and theoretical evidence points towards a diffuse generator
model for spatial noise, producing a structured cross spectral noise matrix
for EEG and MEG. This explains why the proposed noise elimination method under
the interelectrode independence assumption gives incorrect results. In such
a case computations based on coherence matrices are not justified. Furthermore,
dipole fitting methods applied to second order moment data or to eigenvector
data are not equivalent. Finally, interactions between generators, neither linear
nor non-linear, are taken into account in the eigenvector dipole fitting approach.
SUMMARY
OF THE INVENTION
The objective of the present invention is a method and system for the characterization
of both concentrated and diffuse generators of the EEG and MEG, based on all
the statistical information available in these signals, in the form of statistical
moments of all orders, in the time or frequency domain. The invention will allow
the detection and estimation of the effect of the diffuse generators on the
EEG and MEG. Also, it will allow the estimation of an increased number of concentrated
generators, together with their linear and non-linear interactions.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method
for the three dimensional tomography of activity and connectivity of brain electromagnetic
waves generators, said method including:
a) Attaching or approximating a set of electrodes and magnetic sensors to the
scalp of an experimental subject to detect brain electromagnetic physiological
activity in the form of an electroencephalogram (EEG) and a magnetoencephalogram
(MEG), and measuring the exact positions of the electrodes and sensors with
respect to a reference coordinate system determined by certain anatomical landmarks
of the subject's head;
b) Amplifying the said electromagnetic signals detected at each electrode and
sensor;
c) Obtaining on-line digital spatio-temporal signals, consisting of the EEG
and MEG, by connecting analog-digital converters to each amplifier, and digitizing
all data as it is gathered, under the control of a central experimental program;
d) Optional presentation of visual, auditory, and somato-sensorial stimulation
to the experimental subject during EEG and MEG recording, carried out under
the control of the central experimental program;
e) Optional recording and identification of responses produced by the experimental
subject during EEG and MEG recording, for the inclusion of fiducial markers
in the recording, and for the modification of the central experimental program;
f) Optional real-time detection of spontaneous events in the EEG and MEG produced
by the experimental subject during recording, for the inclusion of fiducial
markers in the recording, and for the modification of the experimental program;
g) Determination of a parametric description for the anatomy of the experimental
subject's head (parametric geometry), by means of: i) exact computations based
on anatomical or functional image processing of the subject's head, or ii) approximate
computations based on a small set of anatomical measurements and comparison
with a data base of normal and abnormal variability;
h) Using the parametric geometry for constructing a head phantom with all the
volume conductor properties of the real head;
i) Performing EEG and MEG measurements on the head phantom due to known current
dipoles located in the corresponding neural tissue volume, for determining the
linear operator which transforms original EEG and MEG measurements into equivalent
infinite homogeneous medium measurements (anatomical deconvolution);
j) Using the parametric geometry for determining anatomical and functional constraints
for the localizations, orientations, activities, and connectivities of the brain
electromagnetic waves generators (generator constraints);
k) Digital preprocessing of the EEG and MEG for artifact and noise elimination,
and for the separation of EEG and MEG samples related to the fiducial markers,
for obtaining event related components (ERCs);
l) Statistical analysis of the ERCs for determining the most adequate numerical
description of the spatio-temporal properties in terms of sufficient statistics;
m) Computation of the activities and connectivities of the ERCs generators,
based on the static solution to the inverse electromagnetic problem, under the
above-mentioned generator constraints, using said sufficient statistics for
the ERCs transformed to an infinite homogeneous medium by means of the anatomical
deconvolution;
n) in case the generator constraints do not allow a unique solution to the inverse
problem, the number of ERCs generators should be decreased sufficiently to allow
for the proper identifiability of the inverse problem;
o) Statistical evaluation of the goodness of fit of the inverse solution, taking
into account the existence of colored spatial and temporal noise, and including
statistical hypotheses testing on the absence of activity and connectivity of
the ERCs generators;
p) Optional computation of multivariate distances between ERCs generators characteristics
(localizations, orientations, activities, and connectivities) of the experimental
subject and of a normal population as determined from a normative data-base;
q) Visual display of three dimensional and two dimensional images corresponding
to the localizations, orientations, activities, and connectivities of the ERCs
generators, and the optional display of the multivariate distances.
In accordance with a second aspect of the invention there is provided a system
for the three dimensional tomography of activity and connectivity of brain electromagnetic
waves generators, including:
a) A set of electrodes and magnetic sensors adapted to be attached or approximated
to the scalp of an experimental subject for the detection of brain electromagnetic
physiological activity in the form of electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram
(MEG) electromagnetic signals, and means for measuring the exact positions of
the electrodes and sensors with respect to a reference coordinate system determined
by certain anatomical landmarks of the subject's head;
b) Means for the amplification electromagnetic signals detected at each electrode
and sensor;
c) Means for obtaining on-line digital spatio-temporal signals consisting of
EEG and MEG signals;
d) Means for the presentation of visual, auditory, and somato-sensorial stimulation
to the experimental subject during EEG and MEG recording;
e) Means for recording the vocal or movement responses produced by the experimental
subject during EEG and MEG recording;
A central digital computer subsystem, consisting of a multitasking processor
or a set of distributed processors, that includes:
Means for reading the experimental subject's image data in the form of CAT scan
images, NMR images, or in the form of a small set of anatomical measurements,
and means for computing and storing the descriptive parametric geometry, the
anatomical deconvolution operator, and the generator constraints;
Means for constructing a head phantom based on the descriptive parametric geometry,
and means for the implantation of current dipoles in the corresponding neural
tissue volume of the phantom;
Means for programming and for the control of experiments that comprise stimulation
of the experimental subject, recording of the subject's responses, detection
and recording of special EEG and MEG events, and simultaneous recording of the
digitized electromagnetic signals;
Means for pre-processing the recorded electromagnetic signals for artifact and
noise elimination;
Means for estimating event related components (ERCs);
Means for computing the ERCs sufficient statistics;
Means for estimating the additive non-white spatio-temporal noise due to diffuse
generators;
Means for performing tests of hypotheses about the goodness of fit of the estimated
inverse solution;
Means for estimating the localizations, orientations, activities, and connectivities
of the ERCs generators;
Means for comparing the ERCs generators characteristics with a normative data
base and means for computing multivariate metrics;
Means for the visual display of ERCs generators characteristics and of the multivariate
metrics.
Comments